
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
  <title>MA in Writing</title> 
  <description></description> 
  <link>http://advanced.jhu.edu/ft/forum/index.cfm?forumid=1</link> 
  <generator>FuseTalk Enterprise Edition</generator> 

	<item>
		<title>Changing or non-changing characters</title>
		<link>http://advanced.jhu.edu/ft/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=17&amp;threadid=69</link> 
		<pubDate>2006-09-04T18:30:04 -05.00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>Mary Stojak</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ I was going through some of my class notes looking for something in particular and ran across something BB said in class, that there was a growing trend in stories that change the reader as opposed to stories where the character changes.  Can anybody think of any examples of these?  Maybe Hemon?  Not sure.  Thought I would ask you guys. ]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Characters</title>
		<link>http://advanced.jhu.edu/ft/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=17&amp;threadid=22</link> 
		<pubDate>2006-05-12T10:13:12 -05.00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>Jerri Bell</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ I've been struggling with the middle section of a piece of work.  I knew how it started, and how it would end; what I couldn't figure out was what happened in the middle.  In looking back at notes from last semester, I realized that the middle would have to be made up of moments when my protagonist makes major decisions that get him from his opening circumstances to his final situation -- and that I hadn't thought through carefully enough what those decisions would have to be, and in what situations he'd have to make them.<br /><br />To figure it out, I wrote an "interview" with my protagonist.  I asked him what he wanted, what decisions he thought he'd have to make to get what he wanted, and when he thought he'd have to make those decisions.  Decided that "I" shouldn't have to think these things up by myself.<br /><br />Maybe I'm just schizophrenic, but the "interview-the-protagonist" technique got a lot of stuff out of somewhere and onto paper.  My protagonist seems much more "alive" to me, and now I have some "middle material" with which to work.   Some of it was even completely unexpected.  Does anyone else get stuck in the middle of a story?  Have any other techniques to coax reluctant middles out onto paper? ]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Characters</title>
		<link>http://advanced.jhu.edu/ft/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=17&amp;threadid=15</link> 
		<pubDate>2006-03-03T09:38:20 -05.00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>Mary Stojak</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>11</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ When I read these different books on craft, (or really sometimes I feel like we should say they're literary criticism) I frequently wonder if items that make a light bulb turn on for me, do the same for other people.  Something I read about characters struck me recently.  Round characters are different from our flat, stock characters because they have the ability to surprise us.  Surprise, like the dog won't bark, my superiors will not shapechange when the moon is full, my kids won't ask for any more money.  I know it's like everything we've ever heard about fully realizing our characters.  Still, it's changed me.  This week, I keep wondering if my character Charlie has been up to anything, will he surprise me? ]]></description>
	</item>

</channel>
</rss>
