WHAT'S IN
|
WHAT'S OUT
|
|
Amusing - but not as content rich as I'd like to see. I'm a biologist, not a political scientist, and I was hoping to expand my knowledge a bit as I selected the URL that brought me to this page. Couldn't some more substantive items be added to this list? Perhaps, "preemptive strikes" might find a place here, for example? If we're emphasizing humor, though - how about "leaders having skills we lack," vs. "leaders lacking skills we have." Posted by: R. Michael Anson on Nov 21 at 15:04 |
|
Amusing - but not as content rich as I'd like to see. I'm a biologist, not a political scientist, and I was hoping to expand my knowledge a bit as I selected the URL that brought me to this page. Couldn't some more substantive items be added to this list? Perhaps, "preemptive strikes" might find a place here, for example? If we're emphasizing humor, though - how about "leaders having skills we lack," vs. "leaders lacking skills we have." Posted by: R. Michael Anson on Nov 21 at 15:04 |